By James Bamford at WIRED
An aerial view of the NSA’s Utah Data Center in Bluffdale, Utah. The government is secretly collecting the telephone records of millions of Verizon customers and gathering data from tech companies including Apple, Microsoft and Google. The Obama Administration defends the National Security Agency’s need to collect such records, but critics call it a huge over-reach. Photo: Rick Bowmer/Associated Press
Physically, the NSA has always been well protected by miles of high
fences and electrified wire, thousands of cameras, and gun-toting
guards. But that was to protect the agency from those on the outside
trying to get in to steal secrets. Now it is confronting a new
challenge: those on the inside going out and giving the secrets away.
While the agency has had its share of spies, employees who have sold
top-secret documents to foreign governments for cash, until the last few
years it has never had to deal with whistleblowers passing top-secret information
and documents to the press because their conscience demanded it. This
in a place where no employee has ever written a book about the agency
(unlike the prolific CIA, where it seems that a book contract is
included in every exit package).
As someone who has written many books and articles about the agency,
I have seldom seen the NSA in such a state. Like a night prowler with a
bag of stolen goods suddenly caught in a powerful Klieg light, it now
finds itself under the glare of nonstop press coverage, accused of robbing the public of its right to privacy. Despite the standard denials from the agency’s public relations office, the documents outline a massive operation to secretly keep track of everyone’s phone calls on a daily basis – billions upon billions of private records; and another to reroute the pipes going in and out of Google, Apple, Yahoo, and the other Internet giants through Fort Meade – figuratively if not literally.
But long before Edward Snowden
walked out of the NSA with his trove of documents, whistleblowers there
had been trying for years to bring attention to the massive turn toward
domestic spying that the agency was making. Last year in my Wired cover story
on the enormous new NSA data center in Utah,
Bill Binney, the man who
largely designed the agency’s worldwide eavesdropping system, warned of
the secret, nationwide surveillance. He told how the NSA had gained
access to billions of billing records not only from AT&T but also
from Verizon. “That multiplies the call rate by at least a factor of
five,” he said. “So you’re over a billion and a half calls a day.” Among
the top-secret documents Snowden released was a Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court order proving the truth to Binney’s claim and
indicating that the operation was still going on.
I also wrote about Adrienne J. Kinne, an NSA intercept operator who
attempted to blow the whistle on the NSA’s illegal eavesdropping on
Americans following the 9/11 attacks. “Basically all rules were thrown
out the window,” she said, “and they would use any excuse to justify a
waiver to spy on Americans.” Even journalists calling home from overseas
were included. “A lot of time you could tell they were calling their
families,” she says, “incredibly intimate, personal conversations.” She
only told her story to me after attempting, and failing, to end the
illegal activity with appeals all the way up the chain of command to
Major General Keith Alexander, head of the Army’s Intelligence and
Security Command at the time.
Without documents to prove their claims, the agency simply dismissed
them as falsehoods and much of the mainstream press simply accepted
that. “We don’t hold data on U.S. citizens,” Alexander said in a talk at the American Enterprise Institute last summer,
by which time he had been serving as the head of the NSA for six years.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper made similar claims. At
a hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee last March, he was
asked, “Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or
hundreds of millions of Americans?” To which Clapper responded, “No, sir.”
The documents released by Snowden, pointing to the nationwide
collection of telephone data records and not denied by government
officials, prove the responses untrue.
The deception by General Alexander is especially troubling. In my new
cover story for Wired’s July issue, which will be published online
Thursday, I show how he has become the most powerful intelligence chief
in the nation’s history. Never before has anyone in America’s
intelligence sphere come close to his degree of power, the number of
people under his command, the expanse of his rule, the length of his
reign, or the depth of his secrecy. A four-star Army general, his
authority extends across three domains: He is director of the world’s
largest intelligence service, the National Security Agency; chief of the
Central Security Service; and commander of the U.S. Cyber Command. As
such, he has his own secret military, presiding over the Navy’s 10th
Fleet, the 24th Air Force, and the Second Army.
The article also sheds light on the enormous privatization not only
of the intelligence agencies but now also of Cyber Command, with
thousands of people working for little-known companies hired to develop
the weapons of cyber war, cyber targeting, and cyber exploitation. The
Snowden case demonstrates the potential risks involved when the nation
turns its spying and eavesdropping over to companies with lax security
and inadequate personnel policies. The risks increase exponentially when
those same people must make critical decisions involving choices that
may lead to war, cyber or otherwise.
At a time when the NSA has lost its way and is increasingly
infringing on the privacy of ordinary Americans, it shouldn’t come as
much of a surprise that NSA employees — whether working for the agency
or for one of its contractors — would feel the obligation to alert the
public to the secret acts being carried out in its name. The only
surprise is that we haven’t seen more such disclosures. General
Alexander will surely use all his considerable power to prevent them.
Don’t be surprised if he fails.
Britain, the World's largest slave trader used slave ships to transport 85,000 convict slaves to Tasmania. Britain then carried-out the genocide of the local Aboriginal people. Today every adult Tasmanian is represented by 21 different parliamentarians. The state is always bankrupt yet uses it's population to fund foreign corporations. We can publish your original content under the Creative Commons Attribution license. insidetasmania at gmail dot com
LINKS
- World Population Clock
- World Debt
- Australian Debt Clock
- UKdebtClock
- USdebtClock
- Worldometers COVID By Country
- List of Australian Governments
- media bias/fact check
- SarawakReport
- The Adani Files
- Protect Journalists
- FSC Watch
- Slashdot
- Wired
- DemocracyNow
- MichaelWest.Com
- Independent Australia
- Wikileaks
- Kangaroo Court Australia
- ICIJ
- RenewEconomy
- ABN Lookup
- Hydro Dam Levels
- Tas Alerts
- TasFireBurnMap
- friendlyjordies
- Tasmanian Inquirer
- The Shovel
- Crikey
- TasFinTalk
- ABC Northern Tas
- Tasmania Weekly COVID Cases
- Radio Free Europe
- Fact Check
- Fire Hotspots in Australia
- serpentza
- laowhy86
- Jake Broe US Air Force Vet
- Kyiv Post
- Kyiv Independent
- Bring the Spirits home petition
- Meduza
- Prosthetic Legs for Viktor Blacksmith
- The Military Show
- Evil Bible
- Bloomberg Billionaires
- Crooks And Liars
- Brian Tyler Cohen
- David Pakman Show
- Paul Warburg
- Meidas Touch
- Glenn Kirshner
- Michael Cohen Show
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
We Can Do Better Than Paywall Mainstream Media
WARNING. People who have been systematically brainwashed may find content here disturbing. We refer to the US president as 'Dump' because his name was chosen to inspire subservience.
FROM MARCH 28 THERE WILL BE NO AUSTRALIAN ELECTION COVERAGE HERE AT ALL UNTIL THE ELECTION IS OVER.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Don't put anything in a comment that is threatening. It will not be published. Also unsubstantiated 'pseudo facts' in comments will probably be deleted.